Preferential attachment with choice
John Haslegrave, Jonathan Jordan

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how different choice mechanisms in preferential attachment models influence degree distributions, revealing conditions for power-law behavior, exponential decay, and condensation phenomena.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of degree distributions in preferential attachment models with choice, identifying conditions for various asymptotic behaviors including power laws and condensation.
Findings
Double exponential decay and condensation are possible with meek choice.
Power law with logarithmic correction occurs for greedy choice with r=2.
Condensation-like behavior emerges when r>2.
Abstract
We consider the degree distributions of preferential attachment random graph models with choice similar to those considered in recent work by Malyshkin and Paquette and Krapivsky and Redner. In these models a new vertex chooses vertices according to a preferential rule and connects to the vertex in the selection with the th highest degree. For meek choice, where , we show that both double exponential decay of the degree distribution and condensation-like behaviour are possible, and provide a criterion to distinguish between them. For greedy choice, where , we confirm that the degree distribution asympotically follows a power law with logarithmic correction when and shows condensation-like behaviour when .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
