Distinguishing between evidence and its explanations in the steering of atomic clocks
John M. Myers, F. Hadi Madjid

TL;DR
This paper explores how the separation of evidence and explanations in quantum theory influences atomic clock steering, emphasizing the role of guesswork and spacetime hypotheses in logical synchronization and signal propagation.
Contribution
It introduces a framework linking spacetime metric guesses with logical synchronization in atomic clocks, highlighting the fundamental role of unforeseeable events in physics and communication.
Findings
Spacetime curvature variation limits logical communication bit rate.
Logical synchronization depends on guesswork about signal propagation.
Quantum theory's separation of evidence and explanation impacts clock steering.
Abstract
Quantum theory reflects within itself a separation of evidence from explanations. This separation leads to a known proof that: (1) no wave function can be determined uniquely by evidence, and (2) any chosen wave function requires a guess reaching beyond logic to things unforeseeable. Chosen wave functions are encoded into computer-mediated feedback essential to atomic clocks, including clocks that step computers through their phases of computation and clocks in space vehicles that supply evidence of signal propagation explained by hypotheses of spacetimes with metric tensor fields. The propagation of logical symbols from one computer to another requires a shared rhythm---like a bucket brigade. Here we show how hypothesized metric tensors, dependent on guesswork, take part in the logical synchronization by which clocks are steered in rate and position toward aiming points that satisfy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
