$\mathop{\rm PL}_+(I)$ is not a Polish group
Michael P. Cohen, Robert R. Kallman

TL;DR
The paper proves that certain groups of homeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms of the interval cannot be given a Polish group topology, highlighting limitations in their topological structure.
Contribution
It demonstrates that groups of increasing piecewise linear, bi-Lipschitz, and certain smooth diffeomorphisms of the interval cannot be endowed with a compatible Polish topology.
Findings
$ ext{PL}_+(I)$ is not a Polish group under any topology.
Similar non-Polish results for $ ext{Homeo}_+^{Lip}(I)$ and $ ext{Diff}_+^{1+ ext{Hölder}}(I)$.
Highlights limitations in the topological structure of these transformation groups.
Abstract
The group of increasing piecewise linear self-homeomorphisms of the interval may not be assigned a topology in such a way that it becomes a Polish group. The same statement holds for the groups of bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms of , and of diffeomorphisms of whose derivatives are H\"older continuous with exponent .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
