Three Ancient Halo Subgiants: Precise Parallaxes, Compositions, Ages, and Implications for Globular Clusters

TL;DR

This study precisely measures parallaxes and compositions of three ancient halo subgiants, deriving their ages to inform the timeline of early star formation and compare with globular clusters and the universe's age.

Contribution

It provides highly accurate parallaxes and detailed chemical abundances for three halo subgiants, refining their ages and implications for early stellar evolution and cosmology.

Findings

HD 140283 is about 14.3 Gyr old, close to the universe's age.

Halo subgiants are older than similar metallicity globular clusters.

First Population II stars formed shortly after the Big Bang.

Abstract

The most accurate ages for the oldest stars are those obtained for nearby halo subgiants, because they depend almost entirely on just the measured parallaxes and absolute oxygen abundances. In this study, we have used the Fine Guidance Sensors on the Hubble Space Telescope to determine trigonometric parallaxes, with precisions of 2.1% or better, for the Population II subgiants HD 84937, HD 132475, and HD 140283. High quality spectra have been used to derive their surface abundances of O, Fe, Mg, Si, and Ca, which are assumed to be 0.1-0.15 dex less than their initial abundances due to the effects of diffusion. Comparisons of isochrones with the three subgiants on the $(\log\,T_{\rm eff}, M_V)$-diagram yielded ages of $12.08 \pm 0.14, 12.56 \pm 0.46$, and $14.27 \pm 0.38$ Gyr for HD 84937, HD 132475, and HD 140283, in turn, where each error bar includes only the parallax uncertainty. The total uncertainty is estimated to be $\sim\pm 0.8$ Gyr (larger in the case of the near-turnoff star HD 84937). Although the age of HD 140283 is greater than the age of the universe as inferred from the cosmic microwave background by $\sim$ 0.4-0.5 Gyr, this discrepancy is at a level of $< 1\,\sigma$. Nevertheless, the first Population II stars apparently formed very soon after the Big Bang. (Stellar models that neglect diffusive processes seem to be ruled out as they would predict that HD 140283 is $\sim 1.5$ Gyr older than the universe.) The halo field subgiants appear to be older than globular clusters of similar metallicities: if distances close to those implied by the RR Lyrae standard candle are assumed, M92 and M5 are younger than HD 140283 and HD 132475 by $\sim 1.5$ and $\sim 1.0$ Gyr, respectively.