Analysis of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Mass-Observable Relations using South Pole Telescope Observations of an X-ray Selected Sample of Low Mass Galaxy Clusters and Groups
J. Liu, J. Mohr, A. Saro, K. A. Aird, M. L. N. Ashby, M. Bautz, M., Bayliss, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, S. Bocquet, M. Brodwin, J. E. Carlstrom,, C. L. Chang, I. Chiu, H. M. Cho, A. Clocchiatti, T. M. Crawford, A. T., Crites, T. de Haan, S. Desai, J. P. Dietrich, M. A. Dobbs

TL;DR
This study investigates the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect in low-mass galaxy clusters using South Pole Telescope data, developing new analysis tools and examining the relation between SZE signals and X-ray derived masses, revealing some tensions with Planck results.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analysis method combining SZE data for X-ray selected clusters and extends the SZE-mass relation to lower mass systems, addressing discrepancies with Planck measurements.
Findings
SZE significance-mass relation aligns with high-mass extrapolations.
Y_500-mass relation shows tension with Planck at 2.8 sigma.
Dusty galaxy flux causes a 17% underestimation of SZE signals.
Abstract
(Abridged) We use 95, 150, and 220GHz observations from the SPT to examine the SZE signatures of a sample of 46 X-ray selected groups and clusters drawn from ~6 deg^2 of the XMM-BCS. These systems extend to redshift z=1.02, have characteristic masses ~3x lower than clusters detected directly in the SPT data and probe the SZE signal to the lowest X-ray luminosities (>10^42 erg s^-1) yet. We develop an analysis tool that combines the SZE information for the full ensemble of X-ray-selected clusters. Using X-ray luminosity as a mass proxy, we extract selection-bias corrected constraints on the SZE significance- and Y_500-mass relations. The SZE significance- mass relation is in good agreement with an extrapolation of the relation obtained from high mass clusters. However, the fit to the Y_500-mass relation at low masses, while in good agreement with the extrapolation from high mass SPT…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
