Analysis of the diffuse-domain method for solving PDEs in complex geometries
Karl Yngve Lerv{\aa}g, John Lowengrub

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the diffuse-domain method for solving PDEs in complex geometries, showing how boundary condition choices affect accuracy and proposing modifications for improved second-order accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a matched asymptotic analysis of the diffuse-domain method, identifying conditions for second-order accuracy and proposing correction terms and modifications.
Findings
Certain boundary condition approximations yield second-order accuracy in epsilon.
Other choices result in only first-order accuracy, affecting convergence.
Proposed modifications can achieve asymptotically second-order accuracy.
Abstract
In recent work, Li et al.\ (Comm.\ Math.\ Sci., 7:81-107, 2009) developed a diffuse-domain method (DDM) for solving partial differential equations in complex, dynamic geometries with Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin boundary conditions. The diffuse-domain method uses an implicit representation of the geometry where the sharp boundary is replaced by a diffuse layer with thickness that is typically proportional to the minimum grid size. The original equations are reformulated on a larger regular domain and the boundary conditions are incorporated via singular source terms. The resulting equations can be solved with standard finite difference and finite element software packages. Here, we present a matched asymptotic analysis of general diffuse-domain methods for Neumann and Robin boundary conditions. Our analysis shows that for certain choices of the boundary condition…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
