Azimuthal Jet Tomography at RHIC and LHC
Barbara Betz, Miklos Gyulassy

TL;DR
This paper compares a generic jet-energy loss model, interpolating between pQCD and holographic approaches, to RHIC and LHC data on high-p_T pion suppression and elliptic flow, exploring energy-loss fluctuations and temperature dependencies.
Contribution
It introduces a broad class of jet-energy loss models that fit current data, contrasting with previous models that are inconsistent with LHC results.
Findings
AdS/CFT model with temperature-independent coupling is inconsistent with LHC data.
A class of models with $dE/dx= \, \kappa(T) x^z T^{2+z}$ can fit data for various $z$ and $\, \kappa(T)$.
Energy-loss fluctuations and temperature dependence significantly affect jet quenching predictions.
Abstract
Results based on a generic jet-energy loss model that interpolates between running coupling pQCD-based and AdS/CFT-inspired holographic prescriptions are compared to recent data on the high-p_T pion nuclear modification factor and the high-p_T elliptic flow in nuclear collisions at RHIC and LHC. The jet-energy loss model is coupled to various (2+1)d (viscous hydrodynamic) fields. The impact of energy-loss fluctuations is discussed. While a previously proposed AdS/CFT jet-energy loss model with a temperature-independent jet-medium coupling is shown to be inconsistent with the LHC data, we find a rather broad class of jet-energy independent energy-loss models that can account for the current data with different temperature-dependent jet-medium couplings and path-length dependence exponents of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
