Ballistic and sub-ballistic motion of interfaces in a field of random obstacles
Patrick W. Dondl, Michael Scheutzow

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a discretized model of interface propagation through a random obstacle field, proving conditions for ballistic motion and demonstrating non-ballistic propagation in certain dependent obstacle scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a nonlinear lattice-based model for interface motion in random fields and establishes conditions for ballistic and non-ballistic propagation.
Findings
Ballistic propagation occurs with sufficient driving force.
No stationary solutions exist for certain dependent obstacle configurations.
Propagation can be non-ballistic despite the absence of stationary states.
Abstract
We consider a discretized version of the quenched Edwards-Wilkinson model for the propagation of a driven interface through a random field of obstacles. Our model consists of a system of ordinary differential equations on a -dimensional lattice coupled by the discrete Laplacian. At each lattice point, the system is subject to a constant driving force and a random obstacle force impeding free propagation. The obstacle force depends on the current state of the solution and thus renders the problem non-linear. For independent and identically distributed obstacle strengths with exponential moment we prove ballistic propagation (i.e., propagation with a positive velocity) of the interface if the driving force is large enough. For a specific case of dependent obstacles, we show that no stationary solution exists, but still the propagation of the front is not ballistic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
