The SAMI Galaxy Survey: instrument specification and target selection
J. J. Bryant, M. S. Owers, A. S. G. Robotham, S. M. Croom, S. P., Driver, M. J. Drinkwater, N. P. F. Lorente, L. Cortese, N. Scott, M. Colless,, A. Schaefer, E. N. Taylor, I. S. Konstantopoulos, J. T. Allen, I. Baldry, L., Barnes, A. E. Bauer, J. Bland-Hawthorn, J. V. Bloom

TL;DR
The SAMI Galaxy Survey aims to observe 3400 galaxies using integral-field spectroscopy to study galaxy properties across different environments and stellar masses, leveraging extensive ancillary data from the GAMA survey.
Contribution
This paper details the instrument specifications, target selection criteria, and survey design for the SAMI Galaxy Survey, enabling comprehensive galaxy studies.
Findings
Survey covers 144 square degrees with diverse galaxy samples.
Includes galaxies from field to cluster environments.
Targets a broad range of stellar masses and redshifts.
Abstract
The SAMI Galaxy Survey will observe 3400 galaxies with the Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral-field spectrograph (SAMI) on the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT) in a 3-year survey which began in 2013. We present the throughput of the SAMI system, the science basis and specifications for the target selection, the survey observation plan and the combined properties of the selected galaxies. The survey includes four volume limited galaxy samples based on cuts in a proxy for stellar mass, along with low-stellar mass dwarf galaxies all selected from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. The GAMA regions were selected because of the vast array of ancillary data available, including ultraviolet through to radio bands. These fields are on the celestial equator at 9, 12, and 14.5 hours, and cover a total of 144 square degrees (in GAMA-I). Higher density environments are also included with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
