Landau-Zener evolution under weak measurement: Manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols
Anna Novelli, Wolfgang Belzig, and Abraham Nitzan

TL;DR
This paper investigates how continuous weak measurements influence Landau-Zener transitions, revealing that the Zeno effect can lead to equalization of diabatic state populations rather than freezing, depending on the measurement protocol.
Contribution
It compares adiabatic and non-adiabatic measurement protocols within the Landau-Zener framework using a formalism that models weak measurement as a dephasing process.
Findings
Zeno effect causes equal population distribution under non-adiabatic measurement
Weak measurement formalism models dephasing as a Markovian process
Measurement protocol determines the manifestation of the Zeno effect
Abstract
The time evolution and the asymptotic outcome of a Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg-Majorana (LZ) process under continuous weak non-selective measurement is analyzed. We compare two measurement protocols in which the populations of either the adiabatic or the non-adiabatic levels are (continuously and weakly) monitored. The weak measurement formalism, described using a Gaussian Kraus operator, leads to a time evolution characterized by a Markovian dephasing process, which, in the non-adiabatic measurement protocol is similar to earlier studies of LZ dynamics in a dephasing environment. Casting the problem in the language of measurement theory makes it possible for us to compare diabatic and adiabatic measurement scenarios, to consider engineered dephasing as a control device and to examine the manifestation of the Zeno effect under the different measurement protocols. In particular, under…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
