Random density matrices versus random evolution of open systems
Carlos Pineda, Thomas H. Seligman

TL;DR
This paper compares static and dynamic ensembles of random density matrices, analyzing their properties and similarities, especially in the context of a two-qubit system, with implications for understanding quantum decoherence and entanglement.
Contribution
It introduces and compares static and dynamic ensembles of random density matrices, providing exact results for the static case and analyzing their similarities across different interaction regimes.
Findings
Static and dynamic ensembles show good agreement for moderate and strong interactions.
Ensemble peaks around Werner-like states, influenced by degeneracies.
Maximal entanglement is crucial for agreement in non-interacting qubits.
Abstract
We present and compare two families of ensembles of random density matrices. The first, static ensemble, is obtained foliating an unbiased ensemble of density matrices. As criterion we use fixed purity as the simplest example of a useful convex function. The second, dynamic ensemble, is inspired in random matrix models for decoherence where one evolves a separable pure state with a random Hamiltonian until a given value of purity in the central system is achieved. Several families of Hamiltonians, adequate for different physical situations, are studied. We focus on a two qubit central system, and obtain exact expressions for the static case. The ensemble displays a peak around Werner-like states, modulated by nodes on the degeneracies of the density matrices. For moderate and strong interactions good agreement between the static and the dynamic ensembles is found. Even in a model where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
