The Science Case for the Planet Formation Imager (PFI)
Stefan Kraus, John Monnier, Tim Harries, Ruobing Dong, Matthew Bate,, Barbara Whitney, Zhaohuan Zhu, David Buscher, Jean-Philippe Berger, Chris, Haniff, Mike Ireland, Lucas Labadie, Sylvestre Lacour, Romain Petrov, Steve, Ridgway, Jean Surdej, Theo ten Brummelaar, Peter Tuthill

TL;DR
The paper advocates for the Planet Formation Imager (PFI), a project aimed at directly imaging the Hill Sphere regions in planet-forming disks to better understand planetary system formation.
Contribution
It presents the primary science case for PFI, including simulations and observational strategies to detect planet formation signatures at the relevant spatial scales.
Findings
Simulated images show detectable signatures of embedded planets.
Extended gaps and inhomogeneities observed in transition disks.
Preliminary specifications for PFI design are proposed.
Abstract
Among the most fascinating and hotly-debated areas in contemporary astrophysics are the means by which planetary systems are assembled from the large rotating disks of gas and dust which attend a stellar birth. Although important work has already been, and is still being done both in theory and observation, a full understanding of the physics of planet formation can only be achieved by opening observational windows able to directly witness the process in action. The key requirement is then to probe planet-forming systems at the natural spatial scales over which material is being assembled. By definition, this is the so-called Hill Sphere which delineates the region of influence of a gravitating body within its surrounding environment. The Planet Formation Imager project (PFI) has crystallized around this challenging goal: to deliver resolved images of Hill-Sphere-sized structures within…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
