The Mass-Loss Return from Evolved Stars to the Large Magellanic Cloud II: Dust Properties for Oxygen-Rich Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Benjamin A. Sargent, S. Srinivasan, M. Meixner, F. Kemper, A. G. G. M., Tielens, A. K. Speck, M. Matsuura, J.-Ph. Bernard, S. Hony, Karl D. Gordon,, R. Indebetouw, M. Marengo, G. C. Sloan, Paul M. Woods

TL;DR
This study models dust properties and mass-loss rates of two oxygen-rich AGB stars in the LMC using multi-wavelength data and radiative transfer models, providing insights into dust composition and stellar mass loss.
Contribution
It derives specific dust properties and mass-loss rates for two O-rich AGB stars, informing models of dust shells and stellar evolution in the LMC.
Findings
Dust around faint O-rich AGB may be more silica-rich.
Dust mass-loss rates are approximately 2 x 10^-9 M_sun/yr.
Total mass-loss rates are about 1-1.2 x 10^-6 M_sun/yr.
Abstract
We model multi-wavelength broadband UBVIJHKs and Spitzer IRAC and MIPS photometry and IRS spectra from the SAGE and SAGE-Spec observing programs of two oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch (O-rich AGB) stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) using radiative transfer models of dust shells around stars. We chose a star from each of the bright and faint O-rich AGB populations found by earlier studies of the SAGE sample in order to derive a baseline set of dust properties to be used in the construction of an extensive grid of radiative transfer models of the O-rich AGB stars found in the SAGE surveys. From the bright O-rich AGB population we chose HV 5715, and from the faint O-rich AGB population we chose SSTISAGE1C J052206.92-715017.6 (SSTSAGE052206). We found the complex indices of refraction of oxygen-deficient silicates from Ossenkopf et al (1992) and a "KMH"-like grain size…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
