Extending Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules (\emph{long version})
Jean-Francois Baget, Fabien Garreau, Marie-Laure Mugnier, Swan Rocher

TL;DR
This paper introduces new acyclicity conditions that extend existing notions to ensure chase termination in existential rules, including nonmonotonic negation, improving the theoretical understanding of query answering.
Contribution
It proposes a novel tool for extending acyclicity conditions and extends these results to rules with nonmonotonic negation under stable model semantics.
Findings
Extended acyclicity conditions improve chase termination guarantees.
New tool maintains good complexity properties.
Results apply to rules with nonmonotonic negation.
Abstract
Existential rules have been proposed for representing ontological knowledge, specifically in the context of Ontology-Based Query Answering. Entailment with existential rules is undecidable. We focus in this paper on conditions that ensure the termination of a breadth-first forward chaining algorithm known as the chase. First, we propose a new tool that allows to extend existing acyclicity conditions ensuring chase termination, while keeping good complexity properties. Second, we consider the extension to existential rules with nonmonotonic negation under stable model semantics and further extend acyclicity results obtained in the positive case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Database Systems and Queries
