Log-Concavity of Combinations of Sequences and Applications to Genus Distributions
Jonathan L. Gross, Toufik Mansour, Thomas W. Tucker, David, G.L. Wang

TL;DR
This paper establishes conditions under which linear combinations of log-concave sequences remain log-concave, and applies these results to prove the log-concavity of genus distributions in certain graphs, supporting a long-standing conjecture.
Contribution
It introduces new conditions called synchronicity and ratio-dominance that ensure the preservation of log-concavity in combined sequences and applies these to genus distributions of graphs.
Findings
Proved log-concavity of genus distributions for graphs built from specific fragments.
Identified conditions that guarantee log-concavity in linear combinations of sequences.
Demonstrated preservation of log-concavity through iterative graph constructions.
Abstract
We formulate conditions on a set of log-concave sequences, under which any linear combination of those sequences is log-concave, and further, of conditions under which linear combinations of log-concave sequences that have been transformed by convolution are log-concave. These conditions involve relations on sequences called \textit{synchronicity} and \textit{ratio-dominance}, and a characterization of some bivariate sequences as \textit{lexicographic}. We are motivated by the 25-year old conjecture that the genus distribution of every graph is log-concave. Although calculating genus distributions is NP-hard, they have been calculated explicitly for many graphs of tractable size, and the three conditions have been observed to occur in the \textit{partitioned genus distributions} of all such graphs. They are used here to prove the log-concavity of the genus distributions of graphs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
