The Relation Between SFR and Stellar Mass for Galaxies at 3.5 $\le z\le$ 6.5 in CANDELS
Brett Salmon, Casey Papovich, Steven L. Finkelstein, Vithal Tilvi,, Kristian Finlator, Peter Behroozi, Tomas Dahlen, Romeel Dav\'e, Avishai, Dekel, Mark Dickinson, Henry C. Ferguson, Mauro Giavalisco, James Long, Yu, Lu, Bahram Mobasher, Naveen Reddy, Rachel S. Somerville

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution and tight correlation of star formation rates and stellar masses in high-redshift galaxies (z=3.5 to 6.5), revealing a nearly constant relation with increasing star formation histories over time.
Contribution
It introduces an updated Bayesian SED fitting method accounting for nebular emission and dust, and demonstrates a nearly unchanging SFR-stellar mass relation across high redshifts.
Findings
The SFR-stellar mass relation follows SFR ∼ M*^a with a ~ 0.54 to 0.70 from z=6.5 to 3.5.
The scatter in the relation is less than 0.3-0.4 dex, indicating tight regulation of star formation.
Star formation histories increase with decreasing redshift, consistent with rising SFRs over time.
Abstract
Distant star-forming galaxies show a correlation between their star formation rates (SFR) and stellar masses, and this has deep implications for galaxy formation. Here, we present a study on the evolution of the slope and scatter of the SFR-stellar mass relation for galaxies at using multi-wavelength photometry in GOODS-S from the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) and Spitzer Extended Deep Survey. We describe an updated, Bayesian spectral-energy distribution fitting method that incorporates effects of nebular line emission, star formation histories that are constant or rising with time, and different dust attenuation prescriptions (starburst and Small Magellanic Cloud). From =6.5 to =3.5 star-forming galaxies in CANDELS follow a nearly unevolving correlation between stellar mass and SFR that follows SFR …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
