Conventional versus single-ladder-splitting contributions to double parton scattering production of two quarkonia, two Higgs bosons and $c \bar c c \bar c$
Jonathan R. Gaunt, Rafal Maciula, Antoni Szczurek

TL;DR
This paper compares conventional and splitting double parton distributions, evaluates their contributions to various particle production processes, and highlights the need to include splitting contributions in phenomenological analyses of DPS.
Contribution
It provides the first quantitative evaluation of single-ladder-splitting contributions to DPS for multiple particle productions, showing they are comparable to conventional contributions.
Findings
Single-ladder-splitting contributions are as significant as conventional ones.
Differential distributions for both contributions are very similar.
The parameter σ_eff depends on energy and process, affected by both contributions.
Abstract
The double parton distributions (dPDF), both conventional and those corresponding to parton splitting, are calculated and compared for different two-parton combinations. The conventional and splitting dPDFs have very similar shape in and . We make a first quantitative evaluation of the single-ladder-splitting contribution to double parton scattering (DPS) production of two S- or P-wave quarkonia, two Higgs bosons and . The ratio of the single-ladder-splitting to conventional contributions is discussed as a function of centre-of-mass energy, mass of the produced system and other kinematical variables. Using a simple model for the dependence of the conventional two-parton distribution on transverse parton separation (Gaussian and independent of and scales), we find that the 2v1 contribution is as big as the 2v2 contribution discussed in recent years in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
