Weihrauch degrees of finding equilibria in sequential games
Stephane Le Roux, Arno Pauly

TL;DR
This paper explores the computational complexity of finding winning strategies and Nash equilibria in infinite sequential games, showing how this complexity correlates with the complexity of the game's winning sets within the hierarchy.
Contribution
It establishes a relationship between the Weihrauch degrees of strategy construction and the hierarchy level of the winning sets in infinite sequential games.
Findings
Complexity of strategies increases with the complexity of winning sets.
Weihrauch degrees effectively measure non-computability in game solutions.
Hierarchy levels directly influence the computational difficulty of finding equilibria.
Abstract
We consider the degrees of non-computability (Weihrauch degrees) of finding winning strategies (or more generally, Nash equilibria) in infinite sequential games with certain winning sets (or more generally, outcome sets). In particular, we show that as the complexity of the winning sets increases in the difference hierarchy, the complexity of constructing winning strategies increases in the effective Borel hierarchy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Game Theory and Applications · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
