Equivalence between formulations in Cosmological Perturbation Theory: The primordial magnetic fields as an example
Hector J. Hortua, Leonardo Casta\~neda

TL;DR
This paper compares two formalisms in cosmological perturbation theory, demonstrating their equivalence and applying them to analyze the evolution of primordial magnetic fields, with implications for understanding magnetogenesis.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between the 1+3 covariant and gauge invariant formalisms in cosmological perturbation theory, specifically applied to primordial magnetic fields.
Findings
Demonstrated the equivalence of the two formalisms
Derived Maxwell's equations in the context of cosmological perturbations
Analyzed the evolution of primordial magnetic fields in Poisson gauge
Abstract
Nowdays, Cosmological Perturbation Theory is a standard and useful tool in theoretical cosmology. In this work, we compare the 1+3 covariant formalism in perturbation theory (Ellis et al.) to the gauge invariant approach (Bruni et al.), and we show the equivalence of these formalisms to fix the choice of the perturbed variables (gauge choice) in magnetogenesis. We analyze the evolution of primordial magnetic fields through perturbation theory and we discuss the similarities and differences between these two approaches. We get the Maxwell's equations and show a cosmic dynamo like equation written in Poisson gauge, computing the evolution of primordial magnetic fields. Finally, prospects around these formalisms in the study of magnetogenesis are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
