Hypothesis Testing For Network Data in Functional Neuroimaging
Cedric E. Ginestet, Jun Li, Prakash Balachandran, Steven Rosenberg and, Eric D. Kolaczyk

TL;DR
This paper develops a geometric and statistical framework for hypothesis testing on brain networks derived from neuroimaging data, addressing the challenge that networks are non-Euclidean objects, and demonstrates improved power over traditional methods.
Contribution
It introduces a novel geometric approach to hypothesis testing on network data, specifically using graph Laplacians and Fréchet means, applicable to functional neuroimaging.
Findings
Global network tests outperform mass-univariate approaches in power.
Method allows visualization of individual edge contributions to the test.
Framework applied to large neuroimaging datasets from the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project.
Abstract
In recent years, it has become common practice in neuroscience to use networks to summarize relational information in a set of measurements, typically assumed to be reflective of either functional or structural relationships between regions of interest in the brain. One of the most basic tasks of interest in the analysis of such data is the testing of hypotheses, in answer to questions such as "Is there a difference between the networks of these two groups of subjects?" In the classical setting, where the unit of interest is a scalar or a vector, such questions are answered through the use of familiar two-sample testing strategies. Networks, however, are not Euclidean objects, and hence classical methods do not directly apply. We address this challenge by drawing on concepts and techniques from geometry, and high-dimensional statistical inference. Our work is based on a precise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
