Isophotal shapes of early-type galaxies to very faint levels
Laxmikant Chaware (1), Russell Cannon (2), Ajit K. Kembhavi (3), S., K. Pandey (4) ((1) School of Studies in Physics, Astrophysics, Pt., Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, India, (2) Australian Astronomical, Observatory, Australia

TL;DR
This study examines the faint isophotal shapes of early-type galaxies using deep imaging, revealing that their inner and outer regions have statistically different shapes, indicating independent evolution.
Contribution
It provides detailed measurements of isophotal shapes at very faint levels and analyzes their radial variation, a novel approach in galaxy shape studies.
Findings
Inner and outer isophotal shapes differ statistically
Outer regions show signs of independent evolution
Empirical models for shape parameter distributions are developed
Abstract
We report on a study of the isophotal shapes of early-type galaxies, to very faint levels reaching ~ 0.1% of the sky brightness. The galaxies are from the Large Format Camera (LFC) fields obtained using the Palomar 5 m Hale telescope, with integrated exposures ranging from 1 to 4 hours in the SDSS r, i and z bands. The shapes of isophotes of early-type galaxies are important as they are correlated with the physical properties of the galaxies and are influenced by galaxy formation processes. In this paper we report on a sample of 132 E and SO galaxies in one LFC field. We have redshifts for 53 of these, obtained using AAOmega on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. The shapes of early-type galaxies often vary with radius. We derive average values of isophotal shape parameters in four different radial bins along the semi-major axis in each galaxy. We obtain empirical fitting formulae for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
