A Comparative Study of Meta-heuristic Algorithms for Solving Quadratic Assignment Problem
Gamal Abd El-Nasser A. Said, Abeer M. Mahmoud, El-Sayed M., El-Horbaty

TL;DR
This paper compares genetic algorithms, tabu search, and simulated annealing for solving the NP-hard quadratic assignment problem, analyzing their efficiency and solution quality on real-world instances.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of three meta-heuristic algorithms applied to QAP, highlighting their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Findings
Genetic Algorithm yields the best solution quality.
Tabu Search has the fastest runtime.
Simulated annealing offers a balanced trade-off.
Abstract
Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP) is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem, therefore, solving the QAP requires applying one or more of the meta-heuristic algorithms. This paper presents a comparative study between Meta-heuristic algorithms: Genetic Algorithm, Tabu Search, and Simulated annealing for solving a real-life (QAP) and analyze their performance in terms of both runtime efficiency and solution quality. The results show that Genetic Algorithm has a better solution quality while Tabu Search has a faster execution time in comparison with other Meta-heuristic algorithms for solving QAP.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
