Naturality vs perturbativity, $B_s$ physics, and LHC data in triplet extension of MSSM
Priyotosh Bandyopadhyay, Stefano Di Chiara, Katri Huitu, Asl{\i}, Sabanc{\i} Ke\c{c}eli

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the $Y=0$ Triplet Extended Supersymmetric Standard Model's compatibility with Higgs and $B_s$ decay data, analyzing perturbativity, fine-tuning, and potential signals at the LHC.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of TESSM, including perturbativity constraints, fine-tuning reduction, and fits to Higgs and $B_s$ decay observables, highlighting the impact of the triplet coupling.
Findings
TESSM remains perturbative for $|\lambda| extless 1.34$.
Fine-tuning is reduced for $|\lambda| extgreater 0.8$ compared to MSSM.
Experimental data disfavors large $|\lambda|$ due to $B_s o X_s \gamma$ constraints.
Abstract
In this study we investigate the phenomenological viability of the Triplet Extended Supersymmetric Standard Model (TESSM) by comparing its predictions with the current Higgs data from ATLAS, CMS, and Tevatron, as well as the measured value of the branching ratio. We scan numerically the parameter space for data points generating the measured particle mass spectrum and also satisfying current direct search constraints on new particles. We require all the couplings to be perturbative up to the scale TeV, by running them with newly calculated two loop beta functions, and find that TESSM retains perturbativity as long as , the triplet coupling to the two Higgs doublets, is smaller than 1.34 in absolute value. For we show that the fine-tuning associated to each viable data point can be greatly reduced as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
