True precision limits in quantum metrology
Marcin Jarzyna, Rafal Demkowicz-Dobrzanski

TL;DR
This paper compares quantum Fisher information and Bayesian methods for quantum metrology, revealing their agreement under noise but discrepancies in decoherence-free scenarios, and discusses implications for precision limits and states with indefinite particles.
Contribution
It demonstrates the limits of quantum Fisher information as a performance metric, especially in decoherence-free cases, and proposes a general formula for asymptotic precision limits.
Findings
QFI and Bayesian approaches agree with noise presence
Discrepancy between QFI and Bayesian predictions in decoherence-free estimation
Sub-Heisenberg precisions with indefinite particle states are not practically feasible
Abstract
We show that quantification of the performance of quantum-enhanced measurement schemes based on the concept of quantum Fisher information yields asymptotically equivalent results as the rigorous Bayesian approach, provided generic uncorrelated noise is present in the setup. At the same time, we show that for the problem of decoherence-free phase estimation this equivalence breaks down and the achievable estimation uncertainty calculated within the Bayesian approach is by a factor larger than that predicted by the QFI even in the large prior knowledge (small parameter fluctuation) regime, where QFI is conventionally regarded as a reliable figure of merit. We conjecture that the analogous discrepancy is present in arbitrary decoherence-free unitary parameter estimation scheme and propose a general formula for the asymptotically achievable precision limit. We also discuss protocols…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
