Combined Multipoint Remote and In Situ Observations of the Asymmetric Evolution of a Fast Solar Coronal Mass Ejection
T. Rollett, C. Moestl, M. Temmer, R. A. Frahm, J. A. Davies, A. M., Veronig, B. Vrsnak, U. V. Amerstorfer, C. J. Farrugia, T. Zic, and T. L., Zhang

TL;DR
This study combines remote sensing and in situ observations of a fast CME to analyze its asymmetric evolution, shape, and interaction with solar wind and preceding CMEs, improving understanding of CME propagation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel constrained self-similar expansion method and demonstrates the impact of prior CMEs and solar wind conditions on CME evolution.
Findings
Venus-directed CME segment decelerated gradually from ~2700 km/s to ~1500 km/s
Earth-directed CME experienced abrupt slowdown below 35 R_sun from ~1700 to ~900 km/s
Preceding CMEs significantly disturbed the shape and propagation of the studied CME
Abstract
We present an analysis of the fast coronal mass ejection (CME) of 2012 March 7, which was imaged by both STEREO spacecraft and observed in situ by MESSENGER, Venus Express, Wind and Mars Express. Based on detected arrivals at four different positions in interplanetary space, it was possible to strongly constrain the kinematics and the shape of the ejection. Using the white-light heliospheric imagery from STEREO-A and B, we derived two different kinematical profiles for the CME by applying the novel constrained self-similar expansion method. In addition, we used a drag-based model to investigate the influence of the ambient solar wind on the CME's propagation. We found that two preceding CMEs heading in different directions disturbed the overall shape of the CME and influenced its propagation behavior. While the Venus-directed segment underwent a gradual deceleration (from ~2700 km/s at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
