Riemann hypothesis is not correct
JinHua Fei

TL;DR
This paper argues that the Riemann hypothesis is incorrect by applying Nevanlinna's Second Main Theorem, leading to a contradiction with established theorems in the value distribution theory of the Riemann zeta-function.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of Nevanlinna's Second Main Theorem to disprove the Riemann hypothesis, challenging a long-standing conjecture.
Findings
Derives a contradiction with established theorems assuming the Riemann hypothesis
Proves the Riemann hypothesis is incorrect based on value distribution theory
Provides a new approach to addressing the hypothesis using complex analysis
Abstract
This paper use Nevanlinna's Second Main Theorem of the value distribution theory, we got an important conclusion by Riemann hypothesis. this conclusion contradicts the Theorem 8.12 in Titchmarsh's book "Theory of the Riemann Zeta-functions", therefore we prove that Riemann hypothesis is incorrect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeromorphic and Entire Functions · Holomorphic and Operator Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research
