A Constructive Version of Tarski's Geometry
Michael Beeson

TL;DR
This paper develops three constructive versions of Tarski's Euclidean geometry theory, modifying axioms to ensure unique, continuous point existence, linking formal geometry with ruler-and-compass constructions.
Contribution
It introduces three modified, constructive versions of Tarski's geometry theory that connect formal axioms with practical ruler-and-compass constructions.
Findings
Constructive axioms ensure unique, continuous point existence.
Points proven to exist can be constructed with ruler and compass.
The modified theories retain the same theorems as Tarski's original theory.
Abstract
Euclid's reasoning is essentially constructive. Tarski's elegant and concise first-order theory of Euclidean geometry, on the other hand, is essentially non-constructive, even if we restrict attention (as we do here) to the theory with line-circle and circle-circle continuity in place of first-order Dedekind completeness. Here we exhibit three constructive versions of Tarski's theory. One, like Tarski's theory, has existential axioms and no function symbols. We then consider a version in which function symbols are used instead of existential quantifiers. The third version has a function symbol for the intersection point of two non-parallel, non-coincident lines, instead of only for intersection points produced by Pasch's axiom and the parallel axiom; this choice of function symbols connects directly to ruler-and-compass constructions. All three versions have this in common: the axioms…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · History and Theory of Mathematics · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
