Stable and unstable cosmological models in bimetric massive gravity
Frank K\"onnig (1), Yashar Akrami (2), Luca Amendola (1), Mariele, Motta (3), Adam R. Solomon (4) ((1) ITP Univ. of Heidelberg, (2) Inst. Theor., Astrophys., Oslo, (3) Univ. of Geneva, Dept. Theor. Phys., (4) Univ. of, Cambridge, DAMTP)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the stability of linear perturbations in ghost-free bimetric massive gravity models, identifying a viable self-accelerating model with stable perturbations and analyzing its cosmological implications.
Contribution
It derives stability criteria for bimetric gravity models and identifies a specific stable self-accelerating model, IBB, with detailed cosmological predictions.
Findings
IBB model exhibits stable linear perturbations and viable background evolution.
Predicted matter density parameter is Ω_{m0}=0.18.
Growth rate of structure approximated by f(z)≈Ω_{m}^{0.47}[1+0.21z/(1+z)].
Abstract
Nonlinear, ghost-free massive gravity has two tensor fields; when both are dynamical, the mass of the graviton can lead to cosmic acceleration that agrees with background data, even in the absence of a cosmological constant. Here the question of the stability of linear perturbations in this bimetric theory is examined. Instabilities are presented for several classes of models, and simple criteria for the cosmological stability of massive bigravity are derived. In this way, we identify a particular self-accelerating bigravity model, infinite-branch bigravity (IBB), which exhibits both viable background evolution and stable linear perturbations. We discuss the modified gravity parameters for IBB, which do not reduce to the standard CDM result at early times, and compute the combined likelihood from measured growth data and type Ia supernovae. IBB predicts a present matter density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
