Extragalactic radio sources with sharply inverted spectrum at metre wavelengths
Gopal-Krishna, S. K. Sirothia, Mukul Mhaskey, Pritesh Ranadive, Paul, J. Wiita, A. Goyal, N. G. Kantharia, C. H. Ishwara-Chandra

TL;DR
This study systematically searches for rare extragalactic radio sources with sharply inverted spectra at low frequencies, aiming to identify candidates that challenge standard synchrotron self-absorption models and suggest alternative physical mechanisms.
Contribution
First systematic search for extragalactic radio sources with spectral index ≥ +2.0 at metre wavelengths, identifying candidates with extremely inverted spectra that imply non-standard absorption or electron energy distributions.
Findings
Seven sources with spectral index > +2.0 found in survey overlap region.
Two sources are strong candidates for spectral index > +2.5.
Most sources exhibit Gigahertz-Peaked-Spectrum characteristics.
Abstract
We present the first results of a systematic search for the rare extragalactic radio sources showing an inverted (integrated) spectrum, with spectral index , a previously unexplored spectral domain. The search is expected to yield strong candidates for , for which the standard synchrotron self-absorption (characterized by a single power-law energy distribution of relativistic electron population) would not be a plausible explanation, even in an ideal case of a perfectly homogeneous source of incoherent synchrotron radiation. Such sharply inverted spectra, if found, would require alternative explanations, e.g., free-free absorption, or non-standard energy distribution of relativistic electrons which differs from a power-law (e.g., Maxwellian). The search was carried out by comparing two sensitive low-frequency radio surveys made with sub-arcminute…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
