The critical radiation intensity for direct collapse black hole formation: dependence on the radiation spectral shape
Kazuyuki Sugimura, Kazuyuki Omukai, Akio K. Inoue

TL;DR
This study investigates how the critical radiation intensity needed for direct collapse black hole formation varies with spectral shape, finding that realistic spectra require higher intensities than previously estimated, impacting black hole formation models.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the dependence of the critical radiation intensity on spectral shape and metallicity, refining previous estimates for DCBH formation conditions.
Findings
J^crit is insensitive to age or metallicity in constant star formation galaxies.
J^crit decreases with galaxy age or metallicity in instantaneous starburst galaxies.
Higher J^crit values for realistic spectra suggest lower DCBH number densities than previously thought.
Abstract
It has been proposed that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are originated from direct-collapse black holes (DCBHs) that are formed at z gtrsim 10 in the primordial gas in the case that H2 cooling is suppressed by strong external radiation. In this work, we study the critical specific intensity J^crit required for DCBH formation for various radiation spectral shapes by a series of one-zone calculations of a collapsing primordial- gas cloud. We calculate the critical specific intensity at the Lyman-Werner (LW) bands J^crit_LW,21 (in units of 10^-21 erg s^-1 Hz^-1 sr^-1 cm^-2) for realistic spectra of metal-poor galaxies. We find J^crit is not sensitive to the age or metallicity for the constant star formation galaxies with J^crit_LW,21 = 1300-1400, while J^crit decreases as galaxies become older or more metal-enriched for the instantaneous starburst galaxies. However, such dependence for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
