Statistical tests of sterile neutrinos using cosmology and short-baseline data
Johannes Bergstr\"om, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, V. Niro, J. Salvado

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how cosmological and short-baseline experimental data constrain sterile neutrino models, using Bayesian tests to assess their compatibility and the impact of different cosmological datasets.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive Bayesian analysis of sterile neutrino scenarios incorporating various cosmological data sets and short-baseline results, highlighting conditions under which sterile neutrinos are favored or disfavored.
Findings
Cluster data inclusion favors sterile neutrino models with suppressed radiation density contributions.
Sterile neutrino models are more compatible with cosmology when their contribution to radiation density is reduced.
The level of compatibility between cosmological and short-baseline neutrino mass indications is quantitatively assessed.
Abstract
In this paper we revisit the question of the information which cosmology provides on the scenarios with sterile neutrinos invoked to describe the SBL anomalies using Bayesian statistical tests. We perform an analysis of the cosmological data in CDM cosmologies for different cosmological data combinations, and obtain the marginalized cosmological likelihood in terms of the two relevant parameters, the sterile neutrino mass and its contribution to the energy density of the early Universe . We then present an analysis to quantify at which level a model with one sterile neutrino is (dis)favoured with respect to a model with only three active neutrinos, using results from both short-baseline experiments and cosmology. We study the dependence of the results on the cosmological data considered, in particular on the inclusion of the recent BICEP2 results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
