When data sharing gets close to 100%: what ancient human DNA studies can teach the Open Science movement
Paolo Anagnostou, Marco Capocasa, Nicola Milia, Emanuele Sanna,, Daniela Luzi, Giovanni Destro Bisol

TL;DR
This study shows that ancient human DNA research has achieved near-total data sharing, demonstrating how openness and transparency can significantly advance scientific progress in complex research fields.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that high data sharing rates are achievable through researcher motivation and proper data availability practices, informing Open Science policies.
Findings
Data sharing rate is approximately 97.6%, higher than other genetic fields.
Most data are shared through body text, with increased use of databases for advanced methods.
Researcher motivation and norms are key to achieving high data sharing levels.
Abstract
This study analyzes rates and ways of data sharing regarding mitochondrial, Y chromosomal and autosomal polymorphisms in a total of 162 papers on human ancient DNA published between 1988 and 2013. For the most part, data are available in such a way as to make their scrutiny and reuse possible. The estimated sharing rate is not far from totality (97.6% +/- 2.1%) and substantially higher than observed in other fields of genetic research (Evolutionary, Medical and Forensic Genetics). A questionnaire-based survey suggests that the authors awareness of the importance of openness and transparency for scientific progress is a fundamental factor for the achievement of such a high sharing rate. Most data were made available through body text, but the use of primary databases increased with the application of complete mitochondrial and next generation sequencing methods. Our study highlights…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
