Conceptual Preconditions of Overcoming of Relativistic Intentions in Modern Philosophy of Science
Sergey Kulikov

TL;DR
This paper argues that certain conceptual foundations, especially the understanding of time, can help overcome relativistic tendencies in modern philosophy of science, emphasizing time's dual nature and cultural-historical aspects.
Contribution
It identifies two minimal foundational perspectives in philosophy of science: the intrinsic nature of time and the limits of human consciousness influenced by cultural and historical development.
Findings
Time has a paradoxical nature, existing and not existing simultaneously.
Time is understood both as a formal mathematical concept and as a cultural-historical phenomenon.
Philosophy of science can maintain foundational status through these perspectives.
Abstract
The paper defends the thesis that it's possible to maintain some conceptual preconditions of overcoming of relativistic intentions in modern philosophy of science ("there are no any general foundations in philosophy of science"). We found two general foundations in philosophy of science as a minimum. From the first side it's realistic to reveal on the base of special understanding of time the value of time not only in natural thought (especially in theory of gravity) but also in humanitarian knowledge. That's why philosophy of science has independent position in epistemology and ontology corresponding to interpretation of time as a general category of scientific thinking. The nature of time has internally inconsistent (paradoxical) character. Time is phenomenon which existing and not existing at the same time. This phenomenon is identified with imaginary movement and also ideal (formal)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
