Monte Carlo simulations of post-common-envelope white dwarf + main sequence binaries: The effects of including recombination energy
M. Zorotovic, M.R. Schreiber, E. Garc\'ia-Berro, J. Camacho, S., Torres, A. Rebassa-Mansergas, B.T. G\"ansicke

TL;DR
This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to explore how including recombination energy affects the predicted properties of white dwarf + main sequence binaries formed after common-envelope evolution, providing insights into binary evolution parameters.
Contribution
It introduces models that incorporate recombination energy into binary evolution simulations, improving predictions of orbital periods and WD types in post-common-envelope binaries.
Findings
Longer orbital periods predicted for systems with recombination energy inclusion.
Higher CE efficiency leads to more low-mass He WDs and longer periods.
Models suggest constraints on CE efficiency and initial-mass-ratio distribution.
Abstract
Detached WD+MS PCEBs are perhaps the most suitable objects for testing predictions of close-compact binary-star evolution theories, in particular, CE evolution. The population of WD+MS PCEBs has been simulated by several authors in the past and compared with observations. However, most of those predictions did not take the possible contributions to the envelope ejection from additional sources of energy (mostly recombination energy) into account. Here we update existing binary population models of WD+MS PCEBs by assuming that a fraction of the recombination energy available within the envelope contributes to ejecting the envelope. We performed Monte Carlo simulations of 10^7 MS+MS binaries for 9 different models using standard assumptions for the initial primary mass function, binary separations, and initial-mass-ratio distribution and evolved these systems using the publicly available…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
