Reassessing the sensitivity to leptonic CP violation
Mattias Blennow, Pilar Coloma, Enrique Fernandez-Martinez

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the standard statistical methods used to assess neutrino experiments' sensitivity to leptonic CP violation, revealing deviations from expected distributions in low-sensitivity scenarios and clarifying the impact of degeneracies.
Contribution
It provides an explicit calibration of the test statistic for neutrino CP violation sensitivity, highlighting when Wilk's theorem applies and when deviations occur due to experimental limitations.
Findings
Deviations from chi-squared distribution occur in low-sensitivity setups.
High-sensitivity experiments tend to conform to chi-squared distribution.
Sign degeneracies influence the test statistic distribution.
Abstract
We address the validity of the usual procedure to determine the sensitivity of neutrino oscillation experiments to CP violation. An explicit calibration of the test statistic is performed through Monte Carlo simulations for several experimental setups. We find that significant deviations from a distribution with one degree of freedom occur for experimental setups with low sensitivity to . In particular, when the allowed region to which is constrained at a given confidence level is comparable to the whole allowed range, the cyclic nature of the variable manifests and the premises of Wilk's theorem are violated. This leads to values of the test statistic significantly lower than a distribution at that confidence level. On the other hand, for facilities which can place better constraints on the cyclic nature of the variable is hidden and, as the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
