Empirical Study of Simulated Two-planet Microlensing Event
Wei Zhu (OSU), Andrew Gould (OSU), Matthew Penny (OSU), Shude Mao, (NAOC), and Rieul Gendron

TL;DR
This study analyzes simulated two-planet microlensing events to assess detection accuracy and parameter recovery, revealing that most recovered parameters are close to true values, but unmodeled influences can cause significant errors.
Contribution
First empirical analysis of two-planet microlensing models from realistic simulations, highlighting detection challenges and effects of unmodeled planets.
Findings
Most recovered planet parameters are close to true values.
Unmodeled massive planets can significantly alter apparent planet masses.
Only a small fraction of events result in missed detections due to similar perturbation forms.
Abstract
We undertake the first study of two-planet microlensing models recovered from simulations of microlensing events generated by realistic multi-planet systems in which 292 planetary events including 16 two-planet events were detected from 6690 simulated light curves. We find that when two planets are recovered, their parameters are usually close to those of the two planets in the system most responsible for the perturbations. However, in one of the 16 examples, the apparent mass of both detected planets was more than doubled by the unmodeled influence of a third, massive planet. This fraction is larger than, but statistically consistent with, the roughly 1.5% rate of serious mass errors due to unmodeled planetary companions for the 274 cases from the same simulation in which a single planet is recovered. We conjecture that an analogous effect due to unmodeled stellar companions may occur…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
