CALIFA: a diameter-selected sample for an integral field spectroscopy galaxy survey
C.J. Walcher, L. Wisotzki, S. Bekerait\'e, B. Husemann, J., Iglesias-P\'aramo, N. Backsmann, J. Barrera Ballesteros, C., Catal\'an-Torrecilla, C. Cortijo, A. del Olmo, B. Garcia Lorenzo, J., Falc\'on-Barroso, L. Jilkova, V. Kalinova, D. Mast, R.A. Marino, J., M\'endez-Abreu

TL;DR
CALIFA is a comprehensive galaxy survey using integral field spectroscopy, carefully selected to be representative of typical galaxies within specific luminosity and size ranges, enabling detailed studies of galaxy properties and environments.
Contribution
This paper details the selection process and statistical properties of the CALIFA galaxy sample, ensuring its representativeness and suitability for integral field spectroscopy studies.
Findings
The CALIFA sample is representative of galaxies with -19 > Mr > -23.1 and stellar masses 10^9.7 to 10^11.4 Msun.
Diameter selection does not bias against large or small galaxies within the specified ranges.
The sample covers diverse environments from field to clusters, and includes active galactic nuclei incidence estimates.
Abstract
We describe and discuss the selection procedure and statistical properties of the galaxy sample used by the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area Survey (CALIFA), a public legacy survey of 600 galaxies using integral field spectroscopy. The CALIFA "mother sample" was selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR7 photometric catalogue to include all galaxies with an r-band isophotal major axis between 45" and 79.2" and with a redshift 0.005 < z < 0.03. The mother sample contains 939 objects, 600 of which will be observed in the course of the CALIFA survey. The selection of targets for observations is based solely on visibility and thus keeps the statistical properties of the mother sample. By comparison with a large set of SDSS galaxies, we find that the CALIFA sample is representative of galaxies over a luminosity range of -19 > Mr > -23.1 and over a stellar mass range between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
