Understanding scaling through history-dependent processes with collapsing sample space
Bernat Corominas-Murtra, Rudolf Hanel, Stefan Thurner

TL;DR
This paper introduces sample-space reducing (SSR) processes that naturally produce Zipf's law and power-law distributions, explaining scaling phenomena in complex systems without relying on traditional multiplicative or self-organized critical models.
Contribution
The authors formalize SSR processes, demonstrate their ability to generate power-law distributions with adjustable exponents, and connect these processes to various phenomena like word frequencies and network diffusion.
Findings
SSR processes lead to Zipf's law in outcome distributions.
Adding noise to SSR processes results in power-law distributions with exponents determined by the noise level.
SSR processes can explain a wide range of scaling exponents in complex systems.
Abstract
History-dependent processes are ubiquitous in natural and social systems. Many such stochastic processes, especially those that are associated with complex systems, become more constrained as they unfold, meaning that their sample-space, or their set of possible outcomes, reduces as they age. We demonstrate that these sample-space reducing (SSR) processes necessarily lead to Zipf's law in the rank distributions of their outcomes. We show that by adding noise to SSR processes the corresponding rank distributions remain exact power-laws, , where the exponent directly corresponds to the mixing ratio of the SSR process and noise. This allows us to give a precise meaning to the scaling exponent in terms of the degree to how much a given process reduces its sample-space as it unfolds. Noisy SSR processes further allow us to explain a wide range of scaling exponents in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
