Private Pareto Optimal Exchange
Sampath Kannan, Jamie Morgenstern, Ryan Rogers, Aaron Roth

TL;DR
This paper explores privacy-preserving mechanisms for barter-exchange economies, especially kidney exchanges, demonstrating that marginal differential privacy allows near-optimal, individually rational allocations, unlike stricter privacy notions.
Contribution
It introduces marginal differential privacy and shows it enables near-optimal, individually rational allocations in private barter-exchange economies, unlike stronger privacy constraints.
Findings
Differential privacy prevents non-trivial Pareto approximations.
Joint differential privacy limits optimal allocations.
Marginal differential privacy allows near-optimal, private exchanges.
Abstract
We consider the problem of implementing an individually rational, asymptotically Pareto optimal allocation in a barter-exchange economy where agents are endowed with goods and have preferences over the goods of others, but may not use money as a medium of exchange. Because one of the most important instantiations of such economies is kidney exchange -- where the "input"to the problem consists of sensitive patient medical records -- we ask to what extent such exchanges can be carried out while providing formal privacy guarantees to the participants. We show that individually rational allocations cannot achieve any non-trivial approximation to Pareto optimality if carried out under the constraint of differential privacy -- or even the relaxation of \emph{joint} differential privacy, under which it is known that asymptotically optimal allocations can be computed in two-sided markets, where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
