Gemini Planet Imager Observational Calibrations V: Astrometry and Distortion
Quinn M. Konopacky, Sandrine J. Thomas, Bruce A. Macintosh, Daren, Dillon, Naru Sadakuni, J\'er\^ome Maire, Michael Fitzgerald, Sasha Hinkley,, Paul Kalas, Thomas Esposito, Christian Marois, Patrick J. Ingraham, Franck, Marchis, Marshall D. Perrin, James R. Graham, Jason J. Wang

TL;DR
This paper details the calibration of the Gemini Planet Imager's astrometric measurements, including pixel scale, orientation, and distortion, using laboratory and on-sky data, and discusses implications for exoplanet orbit characterization.
Contribution
It provides precise measurements of GPI's astrometric parameters and demonstrates the potential for high-precision exoplanet orbit studies with GPI.
Findings
Pixel scale estimated at 14.14 mas/pixel
North angle determined as -1.00 degrees
Distortion residuals are small, averaging 0.26 pixels
Abstract
We present the results of both laboratory and on sky astrometric characterization of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI). This characterization includes measurement of the pixel scale of the integral field spectrograph (IFS), the position of the detector with respect to north, and optical distortion. Two of these three quantities (pixel scale and distortion) were measured in the laboratory using two transparent grids of spots, one with a square pattern and the other with a random pattern. The pixel scale in the laboratory was also estimate using small movements of the artificial star unit (ASU) in the GPI adaptive optics system. On sky, the pixel scale and the north angle are determined using a number of known binary or multiple systems and Solar System objects, a subsample of which had concurrent measurements at Keck Observatory. Our current estimate of the GPI pixel scale is 14.14 …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
