Some remarks on Lefschetz thimbles and complex Langevin dynamics
Gert Aarts, Lorenzo Bongiovanni, Erhard Seiler, Denes Sexty

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between Lefschetz thimbles and complex Langevin dynamics in models with sign problems, revealing insights into their interplay, stability issues, and the impact of singular drifts.
Contribution
It provides new findings on the connection between classical runaways, stable thimbles, and degenerate fixed points in complex Langevin dynamics for specific models.
Findings
Evidence linking classical runaways to stable thimbles
Identification of degenerate fixed points in the models
Sampled distributions relate to thimbles with caveats due to unstable fixed points
Abstract
Lefschetz thimbles and complex Langevin dynamics both provide a means to tackle the numerical sign problem prevalent in theories with a complex weight in the partition function, e.g. due to nonzero chemical potential. Here we collect some findings for the quartic model, and for U(1) and SU(2) models in the presence of a determinant, which have some features not discussed before, due to a singular drift. We find evidence for a relation between classical runaways and stable thimbles, and give an example of a degenerate fixed point. We typically find that the distributions sampled in complex Langevin dynamics are related to the thimble(s), but with some important caveats, for instance due to the presence of unstable fixed points in the Langevin dynamics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
