One thousand cataclysmic variables from the Catalina Real-time Transient Survey
E. Breedt (1), B.T. Gaensicke (1), A.J. Drake (2), P. Rodriguez-Gil (3, and 4), S.G. Parsons (5), T.R. Marsh (1), P. Szkody (6), M.R. Schreiber (5),, S.G. Djorgovski (2) ((1) University of Warwick, UK, (2) California Institute, of Technology, USA

TL;DR
This paper presents the largest sample of 1043 cataclysmic variables identified by CRTS, analyzing their properties, types, and detection completeness, revealing a predominance of low accretion rate systems and limitations of current survey methods.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale spectroscopic identification of CRTS CVs and assesses their outburst behaviors and detection completeness, highlighting the survey's bias towards high accretion rate systems.
Findings
Largest sample of CVs from a single survey to date.
Most CVs are low accretion rate systems with long recurrence times.
Detection completeness is approximately 23.6%, with many CVs having low variability amplitudes.
Abstract
Over six years of operation, the Catalina Real-time Transient Survey (CRTS) has identified 1043 cataclysmic variable (CV) candidates --- the largest sample of CVs from a single survey to date. Here we provide spectroscopic identification of 85 systems fainter than g<19, including three AMCVn binaries, one helium-enriched CV, one polar and one new eclipsing CV. We analyse the outburst properties of the full sample and show that it contains a large fraction of low accretion rate CVs with long outburst recurrence times. We argue that most of the high accretion rate dwarf novae in the survey footprint have already been found and that future CRTS discoveries will be mostly low accretion rate systems. We find that CVs with white dwarf dominated spectra have significantly fewer outbursts in their CRTS light curves compared to disc-dominated CVs, reflecting the difference in their accretion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
