On Solving a Curious Inequality of Ramanujan
Dave Platt, Adrian Dudek

TL;DR
This paper proves Ramanujan's inequality for all sufficiently large x unconditionally and completely on the Riemann Hypothesis, identifying the largest counterexample and providing explicit bounds.
Contribution
It provides an explicit bound for the inequality's validity and solves it completely under the Riemann Hypothesis, identifying the largest counterexample.
Findings
Inequality holds for all x ≥ exp(9658) unconditionally.
Under the Riemann Hypothesis, the inequality is fully solved.
The largest counterexample is x=38,358,837,682.
Abstract
Ramanujan proved that the inequality holds for all sufficiently large values of . Using an explicit estimate for the error in the prime number theorem, we show unconditionally that it holds if . Furthermore, we solve the inequality completely on the Riemann Hypothesis, and show that is the largest integer counterexample.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Advanced Mathematical Identities · History and Theory of Mathematics
