The Liability Threshold Model for Censored Twin Data
Klaus K. Holst, Thomas H. Scheike, Jacob B. Hjelmborg

TL;DR
This paper introduces an extension of the liability threshold model incorporating inverse probability of censoring weighting to accurately estimate heritability in censored twin data, addressing bias from right-censoring.
Contribution
It proposes a novel method for analyzing censored twin data by extending the liability threshold model with inverse probability weighting, enabling unbiased heritability estimates.
Findings
Method performs well in simulations.
Applied to Danish twin data on prostate cancer.
Provides consistent heritability estimates in censored data.
Abstract
Family studies provide an important tool for understanding etiology of diseases, with the key aim of discovering evidence of family aggregation and to determine if such aggregation can be attributed to genetic components. Heritability and concordance estimates are routinely calculated in twin studies of diseases, as a way of quantifying such genetic contribution. The endpoint in these studies are typically defined as occurrence of a disease versus death without the disease. However, a large fraction of the subjects may still be alive at the time of follow-up without having experienced the disease thus still being at risk. Ignoring this right-censoring can lead to severely biased estimates. We propose to extend the classical liability threshold model with inverse probability of censoring weighting of complete observations. This leads to a flexible way of modeling twin concordance and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
