Equistarable graphs and counterexamples to three conjectures on equistable graphs
Martin Milani\v{c}, Nicolas Trotignon

TL;DR
This paper introduces equistarable graphs and constructs counterexamples to three longstanding conjectures on equistable graphs, challenging previous assumptions about their properties and relationships.
Contribution
The paper defines equistarable graphs and provides the first known counterexamples to three major conjectures in the field, within the class of complements of line graphs of triangle-free graphs.
Findings
Counterexamples disprove all three conjectures.
Equistarable graphs differ from strongly equistable graphs.
Counterexamples are within complements of line graphs of triangle-free graphs.
Abstract
Equistable graphs are graphs admitting positive weights on vertices such that a subset of vertices is a maximal stable set if and only if it is of total weight . In , Mahadev et al.~introduced a subclass of equistable graphs, called strongly equistable graphs, as graphs such that for every and every non-empty subset of vertices that is not a maximal stable set, there exist positive vertex weights such that every maximal stable set is of total weight and the total weight of does not equal . Mahadev et al. conjectured that every equistable graph is strongly equistable. General partition graphs are the intersection graphs of set systems over a finite ground set such that every maximal stable set of the graph corresponds to a partition of . In , Orlin proved that every general partition graph is equistable, and conjectured that the converse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
