Sum-ratio estimates over arbitrary finite fields
Oliver Roche-Newton

TL;DR
This paper proves a sum-ratio estimate for sets in finite fields that improves upon previous sum-product estimates by a logarithmic factor, under conditions excluding near-subfield sets.
Contribution
It provides a new, more intuitive proof of a sum-ratio estimate over finite fields, extending prior work and improving conditions and bounds.
Findings
Sum-ratio estimate holds for sets not close to subfields.
The estimate surpasses previous sum-product bounds by a logarithmic factor.
The proof is more intuitive and slightly improves conditions for the set A.
Abstract
The aim of this note is to record a proof that the estimate holds for any set , provided that satisfies certain conditions which state that it is not too close to being a subfield. An analogous result was established in \cite{LiORN}, with the product set in the place of the ratio set . The sum-ratio estimate here beats the sum-product estimate in \cite{LiORN} by a logarithmic factor, with slightly improved conditions for the set , and the proof is arguably a little more intuitive. The sum-ratio estimate was mentioned in \cite{LiORN}, but a proof was not given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Coding theory and cryptography · Finite Group Theory Research
