Metrology calibration and very high accuracy centroiding with the NEAT testbed
A. Crouzier, F. Malbet, O. Preis, F. Henault, P. Kern, G. Martin, P., Feautrier, E. Stadler, S. Lafrasse, A. Delboulbe, E. Behar, M. Saint-Pe, J., Dupont, S. Potin, C. Cara, M. Donati, E. Doumayrou, P. O. Lagage, A. L\'eger,, J. M. LeDuigou, M. Shao, R. Goullioud

TL;DR
This paper discusses the development of a high-precision centroiding testbed for the NEAT astrometric mission, aiming to measure stellar positions with unprecedented accuracy to detect Earth-like exoplanets.
Contribution
It introduces a novel testbed setup combining pseudo stars and metrology fringes to achieve 5e-6 pixel centroiding precision, demonstrating progress towards NEAT's goals.
Findings
Achieved initial centroiding precision close to 2e-5 pixels.
Developed calibration procedures for pixelation error correction.
Validated the testbed design with early experimental results.
Abstract
NEAT is an astrometric mission proposed to ESA with the objectives of detecting Earth-like exoplanets in the habitable zone of nearby solar-type stars. NEAT requires the capability to measure stellar centroids at the precision of 5e-6 pixel. Current state-of-the-art methods for centroid estimation have reached a precision of about 2e-5 pixel at two times Nyquist sampling, this was shown at the JPL by the VESTA experiment. A metrology system was used to calibrate intra and inter pixel quantum efficiency variations in order to correct pixelation errors. The European part of the NEAT consortium is building a testbed in vacuum in order to achieve 5e-6 pixel precision for the centroid estimation. The goal is to provide a proof of concept for the precision requirement of the NEAT spacecraft. The testbed consists of two main sub-systems. The first one produces pseudo stars: a blackbody…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
