Constraining properties of GRB magnetar central engines using the observed plateau luminosity and duration correlation

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that the magnetar central engine model can explain the observed correlation between plateau luminosity and duration in GRB X-ray afterglows, constraining magnetar properties and beaming angles.

Contribution

It analytically links the magnetar model to the luminosity-duration correlation and estimates magnetar spin periods, beaming angles, and efficiencies from observational data.

Findings

Magnetar model explains the luminosity-duration correlation within uncertainties.

Estimated maximum magnetar spin period is ~35 ms.

Short GRBs have wider beaming angles than Long GRBs.

Abstract

An intrinsic correlation has been identified between the luminosity and duration of plateaus in the X-ray afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs; Dainotti et al. 2008), suggesting a central engine origin. The magnetar central engine model predicts an observable plateau phase, with plateau durations and luminosities being determined by the magnetic fields and spin periods of the newly formed magnetar. This paper analytically shows that the magnetar central engine model can explain, within the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties, the correlation between plateau luminosity and duration. The observed scatter in the correlation most likely originates in the spread of initial spin periods of the newly formed magnetar and provides an estimate of the maximum spin period of ~35 ms (assuming a constant mass, efficiency and beaming across the GRB sample). Additionally, by combining the observed data and simulations, we show that the magnetar emission is most likely narrowly beamed and has $\lesssim$20% efficiency in conversion of rotational energy from the magnetar into the observed plateau luminosity. The beaming angles and efficiencies obtained by this method are fully consistent with both predicted and observed values. We find that Short GRBs and Short GRBs with Extended Emission lie on the same correlation but are statistically inconsistent with being drawn from the same distribution as Long GRBs, this is consistent with them having a wider beaming angle than Long GRBs.