Experimental constraints on the $\omega$-nucleus real potential
S. Friedrich, K. Makonyi, V. Metag, D. Bayadilov, B. Bantes, R. Beck,, Y. A. Beloglazov, S. B\"ose, K.-T. Brinkmann, Th. Challand, V. Crede, T., Dahlke, F. Dietz, P. Drexler, H. Eberhardt, D. Elsner, R. Ewald, K., Fornet-Ponse, F. Frommberger, Ch. Funke, M. Gottschall

TL;DR
This study investigates the potential of the $$-nucleus interaction by searching for bound states in photon-induced reactions, finding evidence for a weakly attractive potential much shallower than some theoretical models predict.
Contribution
It provides experimental constraints on the real part of the $$-nucleus potential, showing it is weakly attractive and much shallower than previously predicted by some theories.
Findings
No structures indicating bound $$-nucleus states were observed.
The measured potential depth is approximately -15 MeV, with large uncertainties.
Results suggest the $$-nucleus interaction is weaker than some theoretical predictions.
Abstract
In a search for mesic states, the production of -mesons in coincidence with forward going protons has been studied in photon induced reactions on C for incident photon energies of 1250 - 3100 MeV. The pairs from decays of bound or quasi-free -mesons have been measured with the CBELSA/TAPS detector system in coincidence with protons registered in the MiniTAPS forward array. Structures in the total energy distribution of the pairs, which would indicate the population and decay of bound B states, are not observed. The cross section of 0.3 nb/MeV/sr observed in the bound state energy regime between -100 and 0 MeV may be accounted for by yield leaking into the bound state regime because of the large in-medium width of the -meson. A comparison of the measured total energy distribution with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
