Non-Cooperativity in Bayesian Social Learning
Stan Palasek

TL;DR
This paper models Bayesian social learning in networks, showing that observation levels optimize learning but individuals tend to defect from societal best outcomes, highlighting conflicts in information sharing.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian social learning model on directed networks and compares it to complete graph scenarios, revealing insights into observation incentives and societal outcomes.
Findings
Observation levels maximize learning in both models
Individuals have incentives to defect from societal optimum
Competition over information affects collective learning outcomes
Abstract
We describe a Bayesian model for social learning of a random variable in which agents might observe each other over a directed network. The outcomes produced are compared to those from a model in which observations occur randomly over a complete graph. In both cases we observe a nontrivial level of observation which maximizes learning, though individuals have strong incentive to defect from the societal optimum. The implications of such competition over information commons are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Game Theory and Applications · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
